Navreme Boheme
 
Site search
 
 
3. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODS
3.3 Target groups of the evaluation
3.3 Target groups of the evaluation
From the above mentioned objectives and the analysis of the evaluation themes and questions, the following target groups result, which we mention in alphabetical order; we have assigned an acronym to each of them for further references:
target group acronym
Experts (in particular for the area of human resources development, the ESF and the ERDF, for the areas of partnership principle and transnational partnership, the ESF programming and implementation, management and financing) EXP
Decisive sphere (politicians, national policy makers, representatives of MoLSA for the area of active employment policy, regional and local decision-makers, managers) POLIT
European Commission (CIP EQUAL, Evaluation Department) EC
Final recipients (representatives of development partnerships) in CZ DP
Final recipients (representatives of development partnerships) in selected EU countries DP EU
Clients (clients of services provided/initiated by the CIP EQUAL projects) CLIENT
CIP EQUAL Monitoring Committee MONIT
CIP EQUAL National Support Structure in CZ NSS
CIP EQUAL National Support Structure in selected EU countries NSS EU
National Thematic Networks in CZ NTN
National Thematic Networks in selected EU countries NTN EU
CIP EQUAL Managing Authority MA
CIP EQUAL Managing Authority in selected EU countries MA EU
Applicants(4) APP
(4) This group is a secondary one, it is not mentioned at the majority of activities in the tables to the individual topics and tasks as a target group, it was addressed by means of a questionnaire and above all, some recommendations for future management of the aid from the ESF are aimed at it.

logo
The report is based on source text which is published in ESF Forum and is subject to ESF Forum rules regarding copying, distribution and modification of the text.
Referred by:
0.1 Foreword