Navreme Boheme Navreme Boheme
 
Site search
 
 
Contents

Contents

INTRODUCTORY PAGE
1. The Evaluation Context
1.1 Broader Context for the Terms of Reference
1.2 History and Examples
1.3 General Long-Term Context for Changes
1.4 Basic Aspects of this Evaluation of Changes
1.5 Basic Orientation of the Problem Field
2. Subject‑Matter and Objectives of the Evaluation (Art. 2.2 of the Terms of Reference)
2.1 General Objective and Specific Goals of the Evaluation
2.2 Generally Defined Objectives of the Terms of Reference, Responses to Them, and Their Setting within the Context
2.2.1. Identification of the taxonomy of the projects aimed at the Roma communities issues
2.2.2 Identification of representative projects
2.2.3 Evaluation of the efficiency and economy efficiency of the system of support provided to this type of projects
2.2.4 Evaluation of the efficiency of the projects aimed at Roma Issues
2.2.5 Review of the suitability of the evaluation criteria for project applications with respect to this type of projects
2.2.6 Identification of the currently available impacts of the projects as regards socially excluded Roma communities
2.2.7 Evaluation of the overall success of this type of support in the 2004–2006 Programming Period
2.2.8 Proposal for the setting of this type of support in the 2007–2013 Programming Period
3. Responses to the Evaluation Questions and Tasks (Art. 2.3 of the Terms of Reference, the General Part)
3.1 The Global Evaluation Question: To what extent was the support within the 2004–2006 system generally successful and why? What strengths and weaknesses of the support may be identified?
3.2 The Issues Related to the Utilization of the Social Exclusion Term and a Broader Conception of the Issues Arising from the Terms of Reference and Individual Evaluation Tasks and Questions
3.3 Identification of the Appropriate Evaluation Method
3.4 Projects Taxonomy
4. Evaluation of Effectiveness, Efficiency and Impact of the Projects and Systems of Support to the Projects Aimed at the Roma Community (Art. 2.3 of the Terms of Reference, the General Initial Analysis)
A Evaluation of the projects' outputs, impacts and efficiency of the projects operating directly in the location (field work)
A1. The bases as defined in the projects' objectives definitions and description of some contradictions arising from the nature of the solved issues
A2. The impact of the Social Services Act
A3. Assessment of the field work efficiency as a part of the evaluation
A4. Summary of Part A
A5. Recommendations for Part A
B Evaluation of the Projects' Outputs: impacts and efficiency of the projects on education, educational conditions and methodologies
B1. Comments on the projects under Measure 3.1 OP HRD
B2. The issues related to training and education in the context of acquiring social inclusion procedures
B3. Postponed effect mechanism
B4. Other tools used in the projects focused on education
B5. The role of the educational system in forming the relationship between the majority and excluded groups and individuals
B6. Summary of Part B
B7. Recommendations for Part B
C Evaluation of the Projects' Outputs: The impacts and efficiency of the comprehensive projects implementing direct on-site operations
C1. The mechanisms applied to separate excluded minorities from the majority
C2. The projects' focus on changes in the mechanisms separating the excluded from the majority and the ways of thinking
C3. Issues related to the determination of the objectives and evaluation of the effects of comprehensive programmes
C4. Summary of Part C
C5. Recommendations for Part C
D Evaluation of the Projects' Outputs: other projects (specifically focused on cooperation with specific authorities or on the solution of defined problems)
D Evaluation of the Projects' Outputs: other projects (specifically focused on cooperation with specific authorities or on the solution of defined problems)
D1. Recommendations for Part D
E Evaluation of the Projects' Outputs: the projects of indirect assistance, organisations' capacity building, etc.
E1. The Nature of the Issue
E2. The interpretation of efficiency of this type of support as seen from a different point of view
E3. Summary of Part E
A-E Conclusion Summary to the evaluation of the projects' outputs (A‑E)
5. Responses to the evaluation tasks and questions (see par. 2.3 of the Terms of Reference, a detailed procedure according to individual tasks 1-4)
5.1 The Global Evaluation Question: To what extent was the support within the 2004–2006 system generally successful and why? What strengths and weaknesses of the support may be identified?
Task 1 - Projects Taxonomy
Task 2 - Projects Representativeness
Task 3 - Projects Efficiency
Task 4. – Criteria for the Projects' Evaluation
6. Projects Taxonomy
6.1 Field Projects
6.2 The Projects Aimed at Education and Related Activities and Changes in the Education System
6.3 The Projects Aimed at Changing Local Climate
6.4 OtherProjects of the Intervention Character
6.5 The Projects to Strengthen Organisations and Build Their Absorption Capacities and Other Projects to Strengthen the Infrastructure of Providers
6.6 Summary
6.7 Briefly on the proposed conditions and indicators in the breakdown by individual project types
7. Evaluation Methodology
7.1 Target Groups
7.2 Issues Related to Data and Documents Collecting
7.3 Documents Analysis
7.4 Survey by Means of Questionnaires
7.5 Evaluation Visits
7.6 Structured Interviews
7.7 Field Research
THE EVALUATION TEAM
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
8. ANNEXES
8.1 The projects selected for evaluation visits and field research
8.2 The scenario of interviews and visits (the follow copy for the project evaluators)
8.3 The field research methodology
8.4 Survey by means of questionnaires
8.5 List of evaluation sources
8.6 Summary of the projects and contacts
8.7 Contacts to the Roma Regional Coordinators
8.8 The results of the survey by means of questionnaires – responses provided by the evaluators
8.9 The Terms of Reference for Tenderers